Bluegrass Conspiracy Continues: Scratch a Youngster Assistance Case And Solve a Murder.
Ready for Ky. State Representative Stan Lee By Christopher Hignite November 6, 2007
corrected, with emmendations and additions November 28, 2007
I: Introduction
On April 26, 2007 Lt. Keith Stevens of the Lexington-Fayette County Sheriffs Department arrived at the house of my mother, Jane Hignite, with whom I reside. My mother was there as was my youngest sibling, Brandon, a 27 year old man who was born with Downs Syndrome. Lt. Stevens told my mother that he had a summons to serve me in a child custody case. The County Attorneys Office had been looking for me for pretty a although, he stated. Now that they had caught up with me I was in significant trouble. To my brother Brandon, Lt. Stevens stated What do you feel of your brother now. You are an uncle and he didnt even tell you. Were going to place him in jail for a long time. My mother told Lt. Stevens that I was at perform delivering pizzas and that he would find me downtown at my spot of employment, A Slice of Chicago.
Lt. Stevens left his business enterprise card with my mother. He then came to Slice of Chicago, marched into the back of the developing exactly where the pizzas are made and loudly demanded to know exactly where I was, stating once again for all to hear that Chris Hignite was in a lot of trouble. Stevens was told by the owner of Slice that I was on a delivery and that he, Stevens, could wait outside for me to return. When I did return, Stevens handed me a copy of a Civil Summons issued for me on November 11, 1997 and signed by Robert M. Accurate and Amy Fowler, a Summons to seem in the case of Michelle Brizendine and her daughter, Madison. Later I would understand that this Civil Summons had been occasioned by a Court Complaint pursuing child support issued on November four, 1997, and signed by Fayette County. Margaret Kannensohn and her assistants Byron L. Ockerman, Christopher E. Hutchison, R. Barry Minton.
On April 27, 2007 I referred to as family court lawyer Jenny Scott and on Could 1, 2007 my mother and I met with her. Ms. Scott had already collected copies of papers from the County Attorneys office, and following some discussion of the case, I signed a contract with her, for an initial fee of $750, to represent my interests in the upcoming case. I pointed out to Ms. Scott that, in the upper suitable corner of the original of the copy with which I had been served somebody, at some time, had written by hand 07-17-06. Ms. Scott noted with interest that the section entitled Proof of Service had not been filled in or signed by either Stevens or myself, therefore producing the document seem as if it had under no circumstances been served at all. But, she stated, I do not want to make a deal out of it.
A further set of facts is even far more exceptional. On April 26, 2007 Lt. Keith Stevens told my mother that the County Attorneys Office had been looking for me for pretty a although. On June 28, 2007 The DNA nurse told me, in the presence of Michelle and Madison Brizendine, that her paperwork showed that three attempts had been made to serve the summons. [The DNA nurse stated, by the way, that she didn't perform for the city but for the testing facility nevertheless, her office has doors adjoining those of each the County Attorney and the Loved ones Court Judge, and she also has access to their mutual conference area.] On Could 1, 2007 my lawyer, Jenny Scott also told me that three attempts had been made to serve the summons and she showed me a copy of a piece of stenographers notebook paper bearing three signatures and three dates. Ms. Scott noted, once again with considerable interest, that she had under no circumstances observed the summons attempts listed on a separ ate piece of paper in addition, that in each other case she had identified the dates of attempts to serve a summons and the names of the servers were written on the back of the summons itself. But, she stated, I do not want to make a deal out of it. Lastly, in the last week of October, my lawyer, told me that nobody now remembered the note listing three attempts to serve the Summons, but that the County Attorneys office claims it can create a carbon copy of a note on scrap paper of a single attempt to serve it. And, yes, you guessed it, my own lawyer, Jenny Scott, did not want to make a deal out of it.
I, nevertheless, did want to make a deal of it. It was Wednesday, October 31. There was a hearing of the case scheduled for November 1 at 9 a.m. The County Attorney was asking the judge for a summary ruling that my lawyer Ms. Scott referred to as devastating. I had cleared the reality that I could not be at this hearing and we had agreed that Ms. Scott would act in my interest. Each Tuesday afternoon and Wednesday morning I tried unsuccessfully to reach Ms. Scott by telephone and in individual. I then hand-delivered and slid under her office door a letter of directions containing the distinct wording of a variety of motions which I wished to have entered into the court record. That evening my mother, Jane, and my brother, Cory visited Michelle Brizendine at her house. And on Thursday morning, Ms. Jenny Scott sold me down the river.
Ms. Scott had decided to settle the matter herself. She stated that she didnt want to trigger ill relations with anybody in the County Attorneys office. She stated that my motions would be have been ignored by the Judge. I told her I didnt care if the judge ignored or denied the motions the really reality that the record showed that an attempt had been made to enter them would have carried out the trick. Ms. Scott stated she had taken what she believed was the preferred supply and that she didnt want to do battle.
These days, on November 6, 2007 at four:29 p.m. my lawyer, Jenny Scott finally returned a number of calls that I had made to her. She stated once again that she had read my motions, she stated there were valid points in all of them. Nevertheless, she would be the laughing stock of family court if she had attempted to file them, she was a family court lawyer, she did not sign on with me to take on the County Attorneys office, and possibly I needed to see a criminal lawyer. To place the matter as she herself had place it at our really 1st meeting: My daddy told me not to shit exactly where I consume.
The motions, the valid points that would make Ms. Scott the laughing stock of family court were based on these following six claims:
The County Attorney has a documented history of harassing me. I am privy to secrets that the County Attorney would not want leaked to the public. The mother removed the child from the state and didnt pursue child support so as not to have to be concerned about custody battles with the intention of raising the child as her own with another father. The County Attorneys child support division is plagued with blunders and incompetence producing this a amazing spot to spot somebody if you want to harass them. 1 could at all times claim later that the blunders were due to incompetence and an apology would be given for your time in jail and the price of your lawyer. Michelle has made it a habit of altering her stories to suit her wants and thus nothing she says can be taken with any self-confidence. A comparable scenario occurred in Scott County with a ten year old case that re-appeared following becoming dismissed originally. The officers in the case stated on record that they had been asked to harass me by members of the Lexington Vice Squad. Ten years later, in 2005, the case was re-entered into the computer system and listed and un-finished. This made it seem that I had been avoiding them for ten years. As soon as once again damaging my reputation and costing me funds.
The remainder of this series of articles will substantiate these claims.
Dental Assistant SalaryPharmacy Technician Salary
Registered Nurse Salary
Respiratory Therapist Salary
